Throughout
history, human rights have always been a controversial topic.
People cannot seem to decide who is granted certain rights,
although human rights are supposed to be given to every person
regardless of any possible discriminatory factor. Although there
have been significant improvements in human rights since the 1950s,
scientists can still do more to include human rights in scientific
research. Although human rights should be given to everyone, they
are not always. Around two-hundred years ago, only whites in
America could have human rights. Black Americans were not even
considered people, much less Americans. The Constitution did
establish the Bill of Rights, but those rights were not inherent to
everyone. The plight of black Americans did not change until the
Civil War ended, and they were granted basic human rights.
Nevertheless, everyone would not be treated equally until many
years later. The story of Henrietta Lacks is a notable instance of
a serious deficiency of human
ethicsin
scientific research before some reforms were made. Her
show more content
They must
follow the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of
Conduct, n which requires them to debrief the participants and
clear any possible misconceptions. Furthermore, if a psychologist
is presented with the dilemma of having his ethical
responsibilities conflict with the law or other such governing
bodies, he should honor his commitment to the Ethics Code. These
are two critical advancements of human ethics in two broad fields
of scientific research. Although there is advancement in human
ethics (as previously stated) more could be done to acknowledge and
advance human ethics. However, others might look to these new laws
and deem the issue of human ethics in scientific research to be
properly met. The issue of stem cell research would quickly change
this wishful
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
