Siebers asserts that, similar to the LGBTQIA community, individuals with disabilities are sexual minorities, who are often misunderstood, disenfranchised, and abused by a patriarchal, classist, and ableist majority. Siebers frames his argument into four parts: first, that disabled sexuality expands the limited notion of sexuality, second that disabled sexuality is broadly defined by public and private spaces, three that ableism constructs a hierarchy of sexual conduct, and four that there is a pervasive pattern of sexual violence against disabled people. Seibers first defines the difference between a sex life, which is non-inclusive of disability, and a sex culture, which provides a deeper, more sustained idea of sex and identity (p.139).
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
