Running Head: PEER RESPONSESPeer ResponsesStudents NameInstitutions Affiliation2PEER RESPONSESPart AResponse 1Thank you for an interesting and thought-provoking post. I tend to agree with you thatfactual evidence should be the basis upon which an arrest should be made. This is how aprobable cause, as provided for in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, for an arrestshould be determined. Typically, an arrest happens when a police officer prevents you fromwalking away, such as during traffic stops or regular arrests. At this point, the question ofwhether the police officer has a probable cause or not should largely determine whether an arrestis legal or not. I agree with you on the various ways in which a police officer can establish aprobable cause for an arrest. For instance, in addition to your views, a police officer can look forcircumstantial evidence such as a broken door that indicates a possible break-in. The officer canalso use personal experience to identify and recognize signs of criminal activity or things thatsuggest crime is about to take place. Further, police officers can also establish a probable causeby collecting information from informants and witnesses from the general public. Another areathat I think is important regards the stop and frisk. As you have said, it takes place when a policeofficer or other law enforcement individuals stop and frisks you to look for weapons or such.Unfortunately, most of us do not feel ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
