(A Comparative Analysis of Dramatic Genres Between Shakespeares, King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing) Within the world of drama and performance, there are two central ends of the genre spectrum. These are essentially the light and dark of the stage. These opposite ends of the spectrum are comedyand tragedy, respectively. While some people may prefer one genreover the other, these both find ways to tell great stories with greatly different methods. One eternally famous playwright, William Shakespeare wrote countless plays in both of these styles. Two exquisite examples of these genres are his King Lear, and Much Ado About Nothing. These plays demonstrate the great contrast between comedy and tragedy through the high to low character falls or climbs, amount of humor, and prominence of death and suffering. The greatest difference between comedy and tragedy lies in the transition of how characters rise and fall. Comedies typically end with low characters ending happily, heroes succeeding, and sources of tension find themselves in a show more content
The plot of Much Ado About Nothing is riddled with countless jabs, jokes, irony, and humorous situations. Not all of the humor in a comedy has to be spoken. Some of the most comical moments in the play occur when either Benedick and Beatrice are overhearing a conversation that their friends purposely say to trick their respective hopeless romantic into falling in love. Benedick and Beatrice are deceived by their friends, but this deception stems from their delusion that they can avoid love and marriage. While Benedick rambles about how there is no woman good enough, the audience watches, amused, waiting for him to fall. (Windham). While a tragedy might have a few comical moments, those are far outshadowed by the amount of grief and suffering that goes on within the
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.