Jurisdiction is
the authority to decide who has the right to judge others. This
person can be a judge who has the authority to judge people based
on their expertise in their own courtroom. The person who has the
authority to be judge must ask themselves the question, do I have
the authority to decide this case with my expertise? A criminal
court
judgedoes not
have the right to be a cheerleading competition judge and vise
versa. Yes, they are both judges, but they both do not have the
right to judge on anything other than their own expertise.
Jurisdiction keeps society in order, everyone knows their
place of business. Just because someone has the power to do
something, does not give them the right to exceed their powers onto
something else. Jurisdiction is important to the law because it
controls the right of who has the authority to pass judgment. If
there were no jurisdiction, court systems would not run as operated
and society would be uncontrollable. Everyone would think they have
the right to tell others what to do or how
show more content
Schauer goes
into further detail in Thinking Like A Lawyer the two important
types of jurisdiction are personal and jurisdiction over a subject
matter (Schauer 229-230). Personal jurisdiction is A court can
hear and decide a case against an individual with a few connections
to the location of court, or at times about whether a court can
exercise power over people holding certain kinds of positions
(Schauer 229). It flips flops between the court having the
authority to decide conclusions within the court system and raises
the question of who has the jurisdiction to decide something over a
person with a large position, such as President? The jurisdiction
over a subject matter includes Whether a court can hear cases of
this kind (Schauer 230). Each level of court knows exactly what is
it capable of
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
