the authority to decide who has the right to judge others. This
person can be a judge who has the authority to judge people based
on their expertise in their own courtroom. The person who has the
authority to be judge must ask themselves the question, do I have
the authority to decide this case with my expertise? A criminal
have the right to be a cheerleading competition judge and vise
versa. Yes, they are both judges, but they both do not have the
right to judge on anything other than their own expertise.
Jurisdiction keeps society in order, everyone knows their place of business. Just because someone has the power to do something, does not give them the right to exceed their powers onto something else. Jurisdiction is important to the law because it controls the right of who has the authority to pass judgment. If there were no jurisdiction, court systems would not run as operated and society would be uncontrollable. Everyone would think they have the right to tell others what to do or how show more content
Schauer goes into further detail in Thinking Like A Lawyer the two important types of jurisdiction are personal and jurisdiction over a subject matter (Schauer 229-230). Personal jurisdiction is A court can hear and decide a case against an individual with a few connections to the location of court, or at times about whether a court can exercise power over people holding certain kinds of positions (Schauer 229). It flips flops between the court having the authority to decide conclusions within the court system and raises the question of who has the jurisdiction to decide something over a person with a large position, such as President? The jurisdiction over a subject matter includes Whether a court can hear cases of this kind (Schauer 230). Each level of court knows exactly what is it capable of
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.