Paper details:
LAWS4102 Assignment 2016
In Houghton v The Queen (2004) 28 WAR 399, Murray J stated
(at 409):
‘I do not think it is possible to regard the virus as a thing
falling within s266, in the charge or under the control of the
appellant, of which he has the “use or management”’.
What sorts of ‘things’ have been regarded as falling within
the scope of section 266 Demonstrate by reference to at least three
case authorities. Does the way in which section 266 has been
applied reflect the purpose of the section In answering this
question, reflect upon how section 266 relates to other Code
sections dealing with dangerous things or objects, such as sections
294A and 305.
This is a research essay; therefore you are required to
provide a critical analysis in replying to this question. You are
strongly advised to read and use scholarly writings in the relevant
area to inform your analysis.
"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
