Even complicated and confusing topics will be easily developed and covered if you request our help writing an essay. Place an order today!

Using Technology in the Healthcare Industry /Discussion post

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: 12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric

  Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Initial Post: Content/Comprehension Points: 5 (28.57142%) Points Range: 4 (22.85714%) – 5 (28.57142%) Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed. Feedback:
Initial Post: Timeliness Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits initial post by deadline. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Submits initial post one to three days late. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits initial post after three days. Feedback:
Initial Post: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Engagement/Classroom Interaction Points: 4.25 (24.28571%) Points Range: 4 (22.85714%) – 4.5 (25.71428%) Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Timeliness Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits peer response posts by deadline. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits peer response posts late. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Initial Post: Content/Comprehension–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 4 (22.85714%) – 5 (28.57142%) Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail. Satisfactory 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed. Feedback:

Save your time – order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Initial Post: Timeliness–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits initial post by deadline. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Submits initial post one to three days late. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits initial post after three days. Feedback:

Initial Post: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Engagement/Classroom Interaction–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 4 (22.85714%) – 4.5 (25.71428%) Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail. Satisfactory 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Timeliness–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits peer response posts by deadline. Satisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)   Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits peer response posts late. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback: Raw Total: 17.25 (of 17.5)

Feedback to Learner

Name:12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric

 

testimonials icon
Running Header: MATRIX ORGANIZATIONSMatrix OrganizationInstitutional AffiliateDate1MATRIX ORGANIZATION2Discussion Board 1Some of the techniques neede...
testimonials icon
Co-operative Education Topic Approval Form Learning Goal 3.3: Developing your skills as a critica...
testimonials icon
Explain how Cloud Service Models (IaaS, SaaS, PaaS) and How Microsoft Office 365, Azure Fit In?Explain the AWS?...
testimonials icon
Order Grade A+ Academic Papers Instantly!...
testimonials icon
Imagine that you are the HR Director at your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar. As th...

Other samples, services and questions:

Calculate Price

When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME

You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.

Approx. price
$65
Order a paper. Study better. Sleep tight. Calculate Price!
Created with Sketch.
Calculate Price
Approx. price
$65